You americans keep telling me how that states are in charge of their own affairs..........but apparently not now!

Fucking hilarious!



Thinskin

 

Trump has called the Texas suit, "the big one." People of a certain age will remember that the big one always resulted in Fred having to resign himself to the situation.

 

Thankfully all this, shows that our system does work. The states have not given into Trumps crazed demands. All the states have officially certified the election. Trump went to the courts with bogus claims of voter fraud that were shot down by the courts. Many of the judges were even Trump appointees. Biden got passed safe harbor day, so the rest is just a formality.

But what all this has shown is that Trump is now the repuke party. The repuks will do anything Trump says. No repuke wants to be seen defying trump as he got most of them elected. That's what happens when a party sells its sole to the devil.

 

Trump is a rapist and sexual assaulter of women......those that voted for him condone such behaviour!

In my country you could seek psycological help for such a disorder.

Thinskin

 

The Republican party is the man whose wife just said she's leaving him. He wants this to happen more than anything, but he has to put up a little protest. He can make all the protest he likes, because he knows she's already paid a deposit on an apartment in another city. In the coming years he can say he did his best.

 

I have to disagree. The Repukes aren't just putting up a little protest. They are trying overturn a lawful election. Repuke state legislatures have enabled and backed Trumps attempted coup. Wanna be dictators and despots do that. Not American presidents! How many Repuke members of congress have even acknowledged the election results! Just a handful. So the entire Repuke party is part of this coup attempt.

Sorry but there is no way to sugarcoat what't been going on since Nov 3

 

Have no fear our scumbags on the Supreme Court . Will not hear the voting Cases . Nice job all the scum bags Trump for it to put on the court . He put three of them there now none of them want to do their job . I never trusted Cavanaugh anyway . He is a Fraud . Such a shame we find out after is on the court

 

Huh, this is interesting. Seems that Paxton is under investigation for using his office for political purposes, and as such, some have suggested he's suing these states in order to obtain a pardon from Trump.

https://www.texastribune.org/2020/11/17/texas-ken-paxton-fbi/

 

Poor Georgia....SURROUNDED by "enemies"....do you think California, Michigan, and/or New York will swoop in and save their comrades?

LMFAO

 

Their job does not include doing political favors for the president that appointed them!

But if nothing else, these Trump supporters are consistent in throwing everyone that doesn't go along with this charade under the bus!

 

It's all noise. The are free to protest all they want, with the full knowledge it won't put Trump back in the White House.

All the people behind the lawsuits are lawyers. They know a hopeless case when they see one and they certainly understand that a case that was dismissed is not going to look any better when it's repeated.

 

Wonder if that was True...read where Melania inquired if the US Government will provide financial support for the ex first lady.

 

Listen up here fake tits...the Texas law suit is not about election fraud, no matter that the state-run leftist media propaganda activists want to tell you...it's about State election laws being changed without the consenting or involving the State legislator...that is illegal.

So, get this voter fraud bullshit out of your head when you're referring to the Texas law suit, if not, you'll continue to look foolish as fuck...at this stage of the game, you dont need that.

 

Oh my...I'm not sure where you're getting your mis-information from, me thinks you should seek other avenue to inform yourself.

A State suing States is taken by SCOTUS, why would this yo-yo that you're quoting seem to think that a State Judicial would take such a case, or cant even tell you where such a case should be taken too?

That right there is an absolute indication that your sources are just as un-informed about the make-up of the Federal fucking government, the U.S. Constitution, the Rule of Law...or this mother fucker is just lying out his green teeth.

 

https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/22o155.html

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22O155/162953/20201207234611533_TX-v-State-Motion-2020-12-07 FINAL.pdf

---Non-legislative actors’ purported amendments to States’ duly enacted election laws, in violation of the Electors Clause’s vesting State legislatures with plenary authority regarding the appointment of presidential electors.

---Intrastate differences in the treatment of voters, with more favorable allotted to voters–whether lawful or unlawful–in areas administered by local government under Democrat control and with populations with higher ratios of Democrat voters than other areas of Defendant States.

---The appearance of voting irregularities in the Defendant States that would be consistent with the unconstitutional relaxation of ballot-integrity protections in those States’ election laws.

All these flaws–even the violations of state election law–violate one or more of the federal requirements for elections (i.e., equal protection, due process, and the Electors Clause) and thus arise under federal law.

Moreover, these flaws cumulatively preclude knowing who legitimately won the 2020 election and threaten to cloud all future elections.

Taken together, these flaws affect an outcome-determinative numbers of popular votes in a group of States that cast outcome-determinative numbers of electoral votes.

 

Um, in Pennsylvania, it was the Republicans that made the changes. It was their state legislators.

Texas has no case.

 

What changes.

 

This appears to be a bi-partisan effort to maintain Election integrity to me...

In addition to Missouri, the states joining Texas were: Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah and West Virginia. All of the states were represented by Republican officials in the filing. All but three of the states have Republican governors.

 

To allow for mail in ballots.

Why can't you just cite something specific on what the case is about? Your vague "due process..." comment is worthless, it doesn't state at all what of the constitution that their arguing.

Besides, Texas has no standing to challenge how another state conducts their elections.

 

Despite these caveats, Cutler the PA House Majority leader continued to blast the handling of the election, charging that an activist state Supreme Court created rules and procedures not envisioned in the state’s mail-in voting statute, thus creating confusion among the electorate.