This is just a thought, ....your the only one calling her, "the clatholic cult justice" over and over, havent heard that said anywhere in America, but if you actually knew anything about America, you would know that

And tell me, and the Forum, ....just how intolerant are you? You seem like an exception to the great tradition of tolerance the Netherlands were known for.

 

Oh, we know propaganda when we see and hear it.
The yammering fool thinks by demonizing Judge Barrett he can change something.

Propaganda just doesn't work that way with an educated populace.

It does, apparently, work well with despicables cause they use it enough.

 

I actually think you are right about this. Ask the committee chairman Lindsey Graham. He thought pushing Barrett through would help him and instead its been one of the biggest donation wind falls for his opponent in history and sends Graham to Fox News to literally beg for money.

And something that has becoming a continuing story all its own is the amount of early voting. Right now more than 66 million people have already voted. That is about 5 million more than the total number of people who voted for Trump in 2016. Most experts are pointing out that is actually a reverse reaction to all the voter suppression Trump and the Republicans are engaging in.

They also see things like this where Supreme Court justices are willing to lie in order to try and justify voter suppression.

Brett Kavanaugh caught lying in SCOTUS opinion against voting access during the pandemic: report

https://www.rawstory.com/2020/10/br...nion-against-voting-access-during-the-report/

 

Aww... these poor Libfucks...
The quality of the desperate bullshit has really gone waaaaay downhill.

 

Justices Clarence Thomas and Amy Coney Barrett Reflect History Being Made, Rather than Engineered
By Jennifer Oliver O'Connell | Oct 27, 2020 6:01 PM ET

Judge Amy Coney Barrett was sworn in yesterday as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, after a mildly contentious confirmation process. Justice Clarence Thomas, the most senior Justice on the Supreme Court did the honor of conferring the oath of office.


It was a Kodak moment and a reflection of my age, as I was old enough to watch history happen 19 years prior in 1991. Then President George H.W. Bush nominated Clarence J. Thomas for the Supreme Court. Thomas was filling the vacancy left by the retirement of Justice Thurgood Marshall, a powerful cultural and historical figure, especially to a Black woman like me. In 1991 I was a little less than half my current age (25 years old), and considered myself politically moderate. While I had problems with some Democrat policy points, they appeared to have the handle on individual culture and social justice on which the Republicans still didn’t have a clue. So Justice Marshall and his life, not only as the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, but as a powerful attorney with the NAACP who oversaw decisions like Brown v. Board of Education, was a seminal figure. So I was curious who the Republican President Bush would appoint.

Thomas reflected what many of the “conservative” judges of past nominations also reflected: you use the judicial process to come to a conclusion; you don’t create the conclusion and jerry-rig the process to match it.

Ultimately, it really didn’t matter what his philosophy was, as Justice Thomas said in the 2019 documentary about his life, Created Equal, “ ‘This is the wrong black guy, he has to be destroyed,’” Thomas said.

During the 1991 confirmation hearings, the late Senator Howell Heflin of Alabama referred to him as “somewhat of an enigma”. Thomas responded, “I am simply different from what people painted me to be.”

I could fully relate to both those: people trying to paint you into an image that fits their viewpoint, and people trying to destroy you because you didn’t. My own family didn’t know what to make of me, let alone my peers, who took any opportunity to pick at the fact that I didn’t talk or think “Black”. After watching Justice Thomas’s documentary, I understood more fully why I identified with his story.

Even back then, I was a political junkie. I had actually read about and watched the highlights of the Bork confirmation hearings and saw the way the egregious Senator Teddy Kennedy treated Judge Bork. I thought it was shameful, and it had the intended effect of causing Judge Bork to withdraw his nomination. So, I was curious to see what kind of treatment Clarence Thomas would receive.

I was wholly familiar with not only the conservative leanings of Clarence Thomas, but the condescending treatment he received from others, but especially the Senate Judiciary Committee. Because of my own lack of clear identification in the Black Community, and choices made by my mother in terms of my schooling, I spent my formative years as a “raisin in the sun”. So I recognized that thinly veiled shock, the sanctimony, and the condescension disguised as concern from the society around me. What I appreciated about Thomas was his ability to maintain respect, but to clearly put these Senators in their place. He did this throughout, even after the Anita Hill allegations reared their ugly head. In their efforts at destruction, the Senate Judiciary Committee, led by then-Senator Joe Biden, ended up producing a hero—at least for me.

Those powerful words, “I’d rather die than withdraw from the process” struck me like a lightning bolt, and closely mirrored my own resolve and beliefs: I will not allow you to destroy me. I never believed the last-ditch personal attack of the Hill allegations, and evidence and years of scrutiny has shown that it was a coordinated attack that had no teeth. This would sadly be repeated on steroids in 2018 with the Kavanaugh confirmation.

What I most despise is that what should have been a high point of history for all Blacks, and for the nation, was turned into a circus, thanks to the Leftist political agenda. Instead of allowing history to be made, they wanted to shape history according to their vision. The Democrat/Leftist predilection towards social engineering has always bothered me. It is a disservice to all races, but especially to mine.

Fast forward to 2020, and President Donald Trump’s nomination of Amy Coney Barrett to fill the vacancy left by Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. My political leanings were more deeply entrenched in conservatism by the time Judge Ruth Bader Ginsburg was nominated by President Bill Clinton. While I admired Justice Ginsburg for her life story and being a trailblazer for working women and women in law, her philosophy of judicial activism, a living Constitution, along with her staunch support for Roe v. Wade was troublesome. She served her role on the Court with distinction, became a feminist icon, and at the time of her death was as historical and consequential as Justice Thurgood Marshall. So I knew her death, and the subsequent confirmation would be even more contentious than Thomas’s or Kavanaugh’s.

Amy Coney Barrett is an accomplished jurist who already served in the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals; but like Kavanaugh, her personal life was what Democrats and the Left were attempting to target. A devout Catholic, pro-life, and a working mother with 7 children of her own: two who were adopted from Haiti, and one who is special needs. The identity politics party had little to attack, but they went there anyway. With Clarence Thomas, they attempted to put him into a particular racial box, and then tried to destroy him when they could not.

With Judge Barrett, she hit all of the supposedly feminist markers of freedom of choice, but the fact that she chose to be a person of faith, a loving mother and wife, and an accomplished jurist did not fit the narrative.

As a pro-life, religious woman (no kids) with my own list of vocational accomplishments, I could relate to that paradigm too. The social engineering and narrative created for women who the Left feels should rise to such an accomplishment is not a structure that either Judge Barrett or I fit into. But instead of tossing out the structure, they instead attempt to destroy the person who defies it.

It was a beautiful thing to watch them attempt, but not succeed. Like Clarence Thomas in 1991, Judge Barrett was respectful, attentive, but put the Senators in their place when the need required. She did this simply by being who she was: an exceptional legal mind, an originalist, and a wise educator who broke her philosophy down clearly, while making you feel smarter for having heard it.

All that was left were temper tantrums and lies. The Trump administration, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, and now Justice Amy Coney Barrett stood out as the adults in the room.

It is ennobling that history has been made and expanded by these two divergent, yet complementary appointments. As a Black, female conservative, it is a blessing to see history being allowed to form, rather than engineered to suit a certain end.

 

The fact that Clarence Thomas was asked to swear in Amy Coney Barrett is poetic justice considering that Joe Biden was the committee chairman who launched the “high-tech lynching” against then Judge Clarence Thomas during his Senate hearing for SCOTUS.

 

^^^
As usual, nothing to say

 

Here’s the case for impeaching Clarence Thomas — the most corrupt Supreme Court Justice

https://www.rawstory.com/2020/10/he...homas-the-most-corrupt-supreme-court-justice/

 

I am glad.

I like erotic art, but I dislike pornography.

 

Whatever it takes eh?

 

Still, the whining....from the leftists....continues on

There's an election in less than a weeks time.

For the past 4 years, the adolescent immaturity from the leftists, has been on full display for, not only the U.S., but the world to see...there's an election just a few days off....

From the invasion of privacy that occurred long before Trump had been inaugurated, implemented by a corrupt Executive Administration...to burning business's and extreme violence lead by organized leftist anarchists that have been financed by off shore sources.....there's an election just a few days off.

Historic measures have been implemented to essentially secure the U.S. to maintain what was intended to be a free and independent society, that is represented by a Constitutional Republic...with limited powers.

There's an election just a few days off.

The question will be answered, in less than a weeks time, are the people accepting of what has been happening...the adolescent immaturity...a corrupt prior Executive Administration...burning business's and extreme violence...all implemented by radical leftists?

 

Unfortunately I recently realized that our newest Supreme Court Justice answered a question in such a way that could not only be judged as a lie. But also proven by easily obtained evidence should someone realize where to search. Now me and anyone else knows that she probably didn't realize the answer wasn't completely truthful. Unfortunately that doesn't matter to those that want her off the bench.

Thankfully I don't need to say what question it was or where the evidence could be found. Though part of me kinda wants it to get out she has exposed herself to others on at least one provable occasion. Mostly due to the fact me saying so won't matter at all. Since unless someone was to contact the senator that asked the question it doesn't matter that anyone on the forum knows about it. Though I still refuse to say where the proof can be found.

 

Just like to point out, the thread is now obsolete, she is now a Supreme Court judge...or is this thread staying active for Trumps next SC nomination?

 

We need to know....or, in the words of the beloved Biden...''we dont deserve to know''

 

You wish you non-fucking traitor.

All the ballots are never counted on the day of election. And especially military ballots just to show how much Trump and his quislings hate our troops. But now the mad king dictator is demanding the Supreme Court he and Moscow Mitch stacked make him dictator for life..

Trump demands SCOTUS intervene to stop late ballot counting: ‘The Election should END on November 3rd’

https://www.rawstory.com/2020/10/tr...ting-the-election-should-end-on-november-3rd/

 

Its become obvious that despicables had realized they simply cannot win much by playing fair in the elections. They also can't accomplish much in Congress, mainly because they have no clue or desire how to negotiate.

Instead they try to change the rules to favor them.
Get rid of the electoral college.
Expand the Supreme court.
Expand voting especially for ILLEGAL migrants.
Expand the amount of time to "count votes" which is to say, manufacture them.

The thing is, their plan(s) might work.
But the point remains, that even despicables acknowledge they cannot win fair and square.
Cheating is the only way.

 

It's just sad to see this much Libtard butthurt...

 

Sad, @latecomer91364 ?

Yes. Yes indeed.
Sad.